Sunday, August 31, 2008

The Northwest Passage: Melting Away.

The London (UK) based The Independent has today come out with a story on the state of the ice cap over the Northwest Passage. The news is that this Summer, the Passage has been completely ice-free for the first time, as far as human memory can recall.
Attention to this development was drawn by the drama of a family of polar bears that has been drifting in the Arctic ocean for about a week now, as ice literally melted beneath their paws. This whole scenario can only be seen as a reason for alarm South of 60, as it threatens to permanently alter the status quo that had kept our Country's dispute with the world...frozen.
While very little to no mention of this was made in our media, as Canadians we should be very much aware of what happens in our North, also as a way to hold our Government accountable.
The Harper Government has spent the months since its 2006 Speech from the Throne preaching the need for bolstering Canada's military presence in the North, by appealing to the sovereignty/security nexus, and in the process irreparably confusing and mixing up its two terms. And to their credit, they have more or less followed through on many of their commitments and objectives.
However, while heating up the climate around the True North, the Harper government was also contradicting itself by refusing to take any action on the single measure that could have somewhat prevented the precipitation of the Northwest Passage (and Arctic) issue to actual emergency- as its navigability demonstrates. As a matter of fact if the Northwest Passage is now open to navigation, it is for the effect of global warming. An issue that as is well known, the Government has always refused to take any action, both domestically, and internationally, as the Canada's stance at the Bali Conference last Fall proved.
The crux of the matter being, that if there is any Northwest Passage issue today, it is because of the unmitigated effect of carbon emitting activities, and their effect on climate.
What is ironic in its handling of the issue, is that the Canadian government, with one hand, has been giving to the Arctic 'cause' by boosting a (almost exclusively) military presence, and with the other, it has been taking (from itself), by supporting the single element that could have an impact on the status quo: pollution.
Needless to say, an intact ice cap over the Passage this Summer would still have left the issue of sovereignty unaddressed, but at least it would have preserved what, all considered, was a fairly comfortable status quo. Now that the ice turned into water, let us hope that Canada's Arctic policy does not fall apart.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Watching over the MDA Verdict

The Honourable Jim Prentice in the end rejected the takeover of MDA by Alliant technologies, on grounds that "under the Investment Canada regime (...) we don't see net benefits to Canada in this transaction." (CBC, 10.04.2008). This decision was wlcomed by choral paeans across the board (The Star, 11.04. 2008; Rideau Institute, 11.04.2008), with the exception of commentator (Macleans, ).
Unfortunately, positions like Croynbee's are not uncommon in Canada, where oftentimes an idealised view of economic liberalism has blinded analysts and decisionmakers alike to the power dimension of corporate ownership in the competitive international political economy.

This naive opinion has, over time, been responsible for the sell out of some major pieces of Canada's industrial and financial capitalism, on which successive governments have regularly failed to stand up against.
The final decision by the Federal Government is due today (08. 05. 2008). Let us watch that today's decision is not just an act in a panthomime where the actor's knew of a positive outcome from the start. Let is make sure, that is, that the Minister of Industry stays the course of his initial opinion and definetely rejects the sale.

So, Jim and Stephen, be advised: ve'll be watching over your shoulders...

Monday, April 7, 2008

Of Satellites, Pride and Sovereignty

A big up for The Honourable Jack Layton, who has overtaken the Conservative government on the Canada First lane. With this, the Conservatives undoubtedly deserve some heartfelt sarcasm for all their rhetoric and pizzazzy about reclaiming national sovereignty.

The problem is that after all said and done, the waiting game played by the Harper government by lowering a delay on any decision on the prospected sale of the satellite-producing division of MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd., the maker of RadarSat I and II, as well as the Canadarm, to Alliant Techsystems of the US, looks ironic, not to say contradictory.
This stems from two main considerations:
I- Radarsat2 is essential to the ensure surveillance of the many remote areas Canada's territory is made of, including the Government's new crusade: the Arctic region. Besides considerations of accountability given that MDA has received CND$ 400 million in taxpayers' contributions for the development of sensing technology, for the government to allow the alienation of such a strategic industry would mean jeopardizing Canada's national security as well as any future capabilities.

II- Allowing the sell-out of such a strategic industry "to the almighty dollar" would cast a very negative shadow on the Conservative government. To the extent that the main threat to Canada's sovereignty comes and has always come from the stronghold of the Canada-US defence relationship, permitting the prospected transaction would witness of a serious miscalculation of the nature of that bilateral relationship. The point being that having a technological edge as afforded by devices like Radarsat2 (which at present the US can only dream of) is key to bring some degree of balancing into an otherwise heavily asymmetrical relationship.

While it is true that Cabinet Minister Jim Prentice has until April 21 following his potponement of any decision, and a second level of clearance needs to be granted by Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier, in compliance with the 2005 Remote Sensing Space Systems Act; Jack Layton's promise to take a potential sale of MDA's satellite division ot the court is welcome (Globe & Mail, 06:04: 2008).

Together with the Rideau Institute's important advocacy and awareness activism it is helping to make the Canadian public aware of the issue and putting necessary pressure on the goverment in office.

Will the Harper Government show the maturity to say no to our powerful neighbour thereby living up to its rhetoric, or will it give in to the pressures that are surely being exercised from Washington.

What is right for Canada is easy to tell, but what will the legendarily secretive Harper government do is far from clear. So go on Stephen, make your choice.